Could Leaked Requirements for Movement of Goods to Northern Ireland Provide Basis for Special Arrangements for ACP Triangular Supply Chains

Summary
Proposals for consolidated electronic document requirements for the movement of goods from the mainland UK to Northern Ireland could provide a basis for special arrangements to facilitate the continued smooth functioning of ACP triangular supply chains. Additional arrangements to remove the need for phytosanitary checks on ACP goods entering the UK market via EU27 countries would however be required. While there is seen as being no political objection in the UK to averting disruption of trade with developing countries which enters the UK market via EU27 member states, there is not currently the ‘band width’ in UK government services to deal with this issue, given Covid-19 related demands and the fraught state of UK/EU negotiations. There is therefore a need for the most directly affected ACP governments to launch a political initiative for the establishment of special arrangements to ensure the continued smooth functioning of ACP triangular supply chains. Such an initiative would need to reach out to both the UK and EU authorities to make sure suitable arrangements are in place along the whole of the supply chain.

Details of the arrangements to be set in place for UK trade with Northern Ireland have been leaked. A presentation from Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs service (HMRC) reveals that from the 1st January 2021 ‘firms in Great Britain will be obliged to complete three rounds of customs, security and transit forms on all goods’ crossing from the mainland UK to Northern Ireland. This will be the case regardless of whether an EU/UK trade agreement is in place (1).

According to press reports in The Guardianunder a new “Goods Vehicle Movement Service” (GVMS) system, hauliers or the owners of the freight will be obliged to pre-lodge three types of electronic paperwork before getting on a ferry from British ports such as Liverpool or Cairnryan in Scotland to Northern Ireland’. These new requirements will cover:

  • An Import Declaration Form setting out the customs code or codes for all the goods being transported to Northern Ireland.
  • A Safety and Security Declaration, a document not currently used on goods moved within the EU single market.
  • A Transit Accompanying Document (TAD), ‘which must remain with the vehicle at all times’ so EU authorities can guarantee the load that departs the mainland UK is the same as the load which arrives in the territory of the EU (1).

As a result of these arrangements while ‘the goods going from GB to Northern Ireland remain in the UK market, they are being treated as exports’ (1).

HMRC hopes to establish a streamlined system which will allowed these documents to be collated and submitted electronically before goods movements commence. This will then give rise to the issuing of a single ‘goods movement reference number’ (GMR), which the haulier will present to the ferry operator. The aim is to ‘demonstrate that the cargo is being processed by customs and give port authorities information on how to treat arrivals.’ This will create a situation where ‘some trucks will be given the green light to their destination, others may have to be processed for tariffs if they are making an onward journey to the Republic of Ireland and those carrying food, drink and animal products will be subjected to health and diseases checks’ (1).

Northern Ireland businesses have been appealing for details on how goods movement checks from the mainland UK to Northern Ireland would be implemented since October 2019 (1), describing the need for such detailed information as ‘mission critical’ at the beginning of June 2020. This saw Northern Ireland businesses calling for a six-month deferral of the implementation of the new goods movement checks for goods traversing the Irish Sea (2).

The release of details on how goods movement checks from the mainland UK to Northern Ireland are to be implemented had been deferred following Prime Minister Johnson’s statement to Northern Ireland businesses that ‘they can put customs declarations forms “in the bin” because there will be “no barriers of any kind” to trade crossing the Irish Sea’ (3).  This created a politically challenging situation in terms of the release of the details on how the goods movement checks required under the Northern Ireland protocol to the UK/EU Withdrawal Agreement would be implemented (1)

HMRC plans to pilot the new system of goods movement controls across the Irish sea in the course of November using a ‘light touch’ electronic system which would ‘impose the minimum possible burden’ on traders (1).

A noticeable feature of the proposed new system to be set in place will be the absence of any equivalent movement checks on goods entering the UK market from Northern Ireland (1).

Comment and Analysis
The release of details of the checks to be applied on the movement of goods between the mainland UK and Northern Ireland could provide a basis for special arrangements for the continued smooth functioning on ACP triangular supply chains, currently used to serve the UK market via initial ports of landing in the EU27.Ideally a streamlined system for the movement of ACP goods which enjoy duty-free/quota-free access to both the EU and UK markets is required to enable the continued smooth flow of goods along triangular supply chains. This could be facilitated by the collation of document requirements into a single electronically submitted document with a single ‘goods movement reference’ number (GMR), which would allow both EU27 importers and cross channel  ferry operators, port authorities and official border control agencies to facilitate the smooth onward movement of ACP goods entering Europe via EU27 member states to the UK market through specially designated ‘green channels’ at points of embarkation and disembarkation.

However, this would come up against the problem of the compatibility of EU and UK-only electronic trade documentation systems and the issue of continued UK recognition of EU trade documentation (including phytosanitary import controls) on ACP goods imported to the UK via the EU27.

It would in addition require a clear and early political commitment from the UK and EU authorities to such special arrangements for goods entering the UK market along triangular supply chains. This is necessary so infrastructure and logistical arrangements can be set in place to allow ACP/LDC goods which have been subjected to phytosanitary inspections upon entry to the territory of the EU and which enjoy duty-free/quota-free access to both the EU27 and UK  can be subject to only ‘light touch’ border controls.

This would help minimise any delays in the delivery of ACP goods to final UK customers arising from new border clearance requirements (including phytosanitary import controls). This is particularly important for short shelf life products such as cut flowers, where a 1-day delay in the delivery of goods to the final customers can strip away 30% of the exporters’ profits.

The view at the civil service level in the UK appears to be that an initiative aimed at establishing special channels for border clearance for goods from developing countries which avoided disruption of the functioning of triangular supply chains would meet with general approval at the level of both officials and Ministers. However, given the Covid-19 crisis and the fraught nature of UK/EU negotiations no one in the UK government has the band width at the present time to take up and address these issues.

However, while the launching of such an initiative to address the practical concerns of developing country exporters (mainly but not exclusively in sub-Saharan Africa) is not seen as politically contentious, it would appear to be necessary to delink such an initiative from the fraught bilateral process of EU/UK negotiations.

Against this background there would appear to be a need for the most directly affected ACP governments (with the support of the most seriously affected  private sector bodies) to launch a political initiative for the establishment of special arrangements for the handling of imports to the UK which enter via initial ports of landing in the EU, which addresses both the UK and EU dimensions of this triangular supply chain issue.

In terms of the most affected government and private sector businesses this would appear to require a political initiative from Kenyan and other East African governments with the support of those floriculture and horticulture exporters who make the most extensive use of triangular supply chains in serving the UK market.

These exports have already been seriously affected by the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on passenger-based air freight services (see epamonitoring.net articles ‘What Future Air Passenger Flight Based Cargo Services?’, 16 June 2020 and ‘Covid-19 Related Cancellation of Commercial Flights Beginning to Bite for ACP Horticulture Exports’, 7 April 2020),  with the impact of a poorly managed UK departure  from the EU customs union being likely to considerably delay the recovery of these vitally important export sectors.

While East African floriculture and horticultural exporters are the most obvious triangular supply chains which will be affected, other ACP exporters could also be affected. These range from West African, Southern African and even Caribbean horticulture exporters, as well as exporters of products as diverse as Caribbean rum and Pacific canned tuna and even ACP exporters of chilled and frozen fish. In all of these areas some onward trade via the EU27 to the UK market currently takes place. All of these existing triangular supply chains could potentially face serious unintended disruptions, if special arrangements, designed to promote the continued smooth functioning of these triangular supply chains are not set in place in a timely fashion, before the UK leaves the EU customs union and single market on 1st January 2021.

Smaller countries with limited freight options in serving European markets are likely to be most seriously affected by any disruption of triangular supply chains. This would then involve returning to patterns of freight arrangements in serving the UK market which existed prior to the creation of the EU single internal market. Unfortunately, for many of the most seriously affected supply chains, the development of a substantial export trade only occurred after the creation of the EU single internal market.

While larger exporters are likely to have more commercial scope for restructuring their freight arrangements in serving the UK market, thereby side-stepping the potential disruptions of triangular supply chains, this will require time and careful planning, suggesting that at a minimum special arrangements are likely to be required for an extended transitional period (e.g. up to 2 years after the UK’s  formal departure from the EU customs union and single market).

In the absence of such special arrangement the profoundly damaging economic impact of Covid-19 related disruptions to passenger flight-based air freight services, on which many ACP horticulture and floriculture exporters depend, is likely to be severely exacerbated.

Sources:
(1) The Guardian, ‘First details emerge of system for checks on goods crossing Irish Sea’, 2 July 2020
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/02/first-details-emerge-of-system-for-checks-on-goods-crossing-irish-sea
(2) The Grocer, ‘Northern Irish business demands six-month delay to Brexit border checks’, 5 June 2020
https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/sourcing/northern-irish-business-demand-six-month-delay-to-brexit-border-checks/605503.article
(3) Belfast Telegraph, ‘Johnson tells Northern Ireland businesses to ‘bin’ customs forms’, 8 November 2019
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/johnson-tells-northern-ireland-businesses-to-bin-customs-forms-38674258.html