Summary
The Task Force Rural Africa (TFRA) advances a series of specific recommendations and initiatives aimed at ensuring African agro-food sector development contributes fully to addressing the employment and income earning opportunities challenge faced in Africa. A critical challenge is seen as promoting an appropriate trajectory for ‘the development of the African food industry and food markets’. However this will need to address the tension between the EU’s quest for new food product markets and African aspirations for the structural development of national agro-food sectors. In some sectors this will require a critical review of current patterns of trade and investment relations (e.g. in the dairy sector). TFRA recommendation on structured policy dialogues could prove valuable in this regard. A key issue to be addressed will be the interpretation and application of existing EU-Africa trade agreement commitments, which go beyond WTO rules and undermine national trade policy sovereignty and the effectiveness of chosen policy measures. It will also need to effectively operationalize the EU’s new unfair trading practices directive as this impacts Africa-EU trade flows and support measures to strengthen the functioning of local agro-food sector supply chains. Read more “Task Force for Rural Africa Sets Out Four Strategic Areas and Six Initiatives”
Category: Dairy
The dairy sector offers scope for putting cash into the hands of smallholder farmers on a regular basis and has considerable transformative potential. However this could well be undermined by emerging patterns of EU trade and investment in ACP dairy sectors. These developments cannot be delinked from new patterns of EU support to the dairy sector. There are indications that certain EU dairy companies recognise the need to develop ‘responsible’ trade and investment relations in the dairy sector in Africa in particular. Indeed calls have been made for the establishment of a ‘Code of Conduct for Responsible Trade and Investment in African Dairy Sector Development’. There is also a need for the EU to responsibly interpret and apply the commitments entered into by ACP governments with regard to the use of non-tariff trade policy measures.
Read more.
Brexit Overshadows EU Dairy Sector with Potentially Important Knock-on Effects on ACP Dairy Sectors
Summary
Difficult production conditions in parts of the EU along with continued high export volumes saw EU SMP stocks substantially run down, with the hope being the remaining stocks would be disposed on in 2019. The EC believes EU dairy producers will be well positioned to serve growing world dairy markets, with the expectation being the EC could ‘could supply close to 35 % of the increase in global demand’. The EC expects these exports to increasingly consist of value added dairy products, with EU generated pressures on milk-to-dairy supply chains in ACP countries linked to exports of low prices SMPs being gradually reduced. The EC believes growing consumer demand could see milk production in Africa grow almost five times faster than in the previous decade. However these projections do not factor in the possible Brexit related disruptions of EU27/UK dairy trade flows which could carry ‘catastrophic repercussions’. These ‘catastrophic repercussions’ could include a major resurgence of EU exports of low priced SMPs which could once again disrupt efforts to develop local milk-to-dairy supply chains in Africa seeking to exploit growing consumer demand for dairy products. Read more “Brexit Overshadows EU Dairy Sector with Potentially Important Knock-on Effects on ACP Dairy Sectors”
RFC Announces Factory Expansion and Investments in Local Milk Supplies in Nigeria Amid Slowdown in Growth EU Exports of SMP
Summary
Royal FrieslandCampina has announced a new €23 million investment in developing milk-to-dairy supply chains in Nigeria. However it is unclear how much of this €23 million is linked to factory improvements to process locally sourced milk and how much targets the processing of imported milk powders. A revival of SMP prices to the December 2013 highs would appear necessary to provide a commercially significant stimulus to local milk production in Nigeria. This is likely to require the removal of production distorting EU farm supports, which stimulate EU milk production despite the production costs of most EU milk producers exceeding the revenue gained from milk sales. Since such an EU policy shift is highly unlikely, the Nigerian government may need to consider the introduction of a carefully manged dairy sector trade policy which links import licences to investments in the gradual expansion of local milk production serving local milk-to-dairy supply chains. This would need to be designed and implemented in close consultation with dairy sector stakeholders. However it is unclear whether the implementation of such a carefully managed trade regime would be possible in a country as large and politically complex as Nigeria. Read more “RFC Announces Factory Expansion and Investments in Local Milk Supplies in Nigeria Amid Slowdown in Growth EU Exports of SMP”
Part 2 Country Specific Trends in EU Agri-food Sector Trade with ESA EPA Countries
Summary
The value of EU agri-food exports to Mauritius grew 53% between 2013 and 2017 while the value of EU agri-food imports from Mauritius fell 26%, with this largely attributable to the impact of EU sugar sector reforms. A ‘no deal’ Brexit however could present opportunities for Mauritian refined sugar exporters. In contrast the value of Malagasy agri-food exports to the EU grew 164%, while the value of imports from the EU grew 44%. This is attributable to the fragile political and economic stability attained since 2013. Zimbabwe’s agri-food sector trade flows have been impacted by the sustained political and economic crisis, with volatile export values and no change in the value of imports from the EU for the period as a whole. The value of agri-food exports from the Comoros has increased almost 60% since 2013, with strong growth in the unit value of earnings of both vanilla and essential oils. EU agri-food exports to the Comoros have grown faster than overall exports, at double the rate, with a strong increase in the value of EU poultry meat exports and an even larger increase in the volume. There has also been a strong increase in EU beef exports to Comoros. The Seychelles has no agro-food sector export trade with the EU, while the value of agri-food imports from the EU rose 61% between 2013 and 2017. Dairy products led the way in this trade expansion, with EU poultry meat exports also getting under way during this period. Brexit related issues arise for Zimbabwe in the resurgent cut flower trade given the dominant role the Dutch flower auction houses play in this trade and the potential for Brexit related disruption of triangular supply chains. Initiatives will be needed to ‘Brexit-proof’ these supply chains. For Seychelles and Madagascar Brexit related rules of origin issues in the fisheries sector will also need to be addressed under a ‘no-deal’ outcome to the current Brexit negotiations, with this potentially opening up investment and export trade opportunities in relations with the UK. Read more “Part 2 Country Specific Trends in EU Agri-food Sector Trade with ESA EPA Countries”
Part 1 Overall Trends in EU Trade with ESA EPA Countries
Summary
The EU-ESA EPA is not a single agreement but a collection of five individual yet similar agreements covering a population of some 45.5 million. For 4 countries these agreement have been in place since 2012 while the 5th is scheduled to enter into force shortly. These agreements fall far short of the ambitious regional EPA, embracing up to 18 countries with a population of 541 million, which the EC initially sought. This has split the larger ESA region into 3 distinct groups in terms of trade relations with the EU, thereby complicating intra-regional trade integration efforts. Since the signing of the EPAs EU agri-food exports to ESA EPA signatories have grown strongly (+48%), despite there being no growth in direct EU exports to Zimbabwe. The growth in the value of EU agri-food imports from ESA4 countries was been slower at only +27%. This growth was attributable to the 164% growth in the value of imports from Madagascar which now dominates the ESA4 agri-food export trade to the EU. EU agricultural reforms and the multiplication of EU trade agreements with non-ACP countries are serving to reduce the value of traditional agri-food sector trade preferences, particularly for Mauritius and Zimbabwe. The Brexit process further complicates the situation, although a ‘no-deal’ Brexit could potentially open up new opportunities on the UK market for Mauritian refined sugar exports. Other important issues faced relate to the impact of the new EU plant health regulations on horticulture and floriculture exports and the impact of the expansion of EU agri-food exports on opportunities for the structural development of local agri-food sectors serving national and regional markets. ESA EPA signatories face differing challenges and opportunities as a result of current trends in EU agri-food exports to ESA EPA signatories and the wider Eastern and Southern African region. How EPA provisions are implemented in practice in the future, in the face of Brexit related commercial pressures, will have an important bearing on the future evolution of EU-ESA trade, as well as the scope for the development of intra-regional trade in the Eastern and Southern African region. Read more “Part 1 Overall Trends in EU Trade with ESA EPA Countries”
Cote d’Ivoire: EPA Implementation in the Context of EU’s West Africa EPA Strategy
Summary
In reviewing the EU-Cote d’Ivoire EPA the EC has placed considerable emphasis on the 80% expansion of Ivorian banana exports to the EU since the granting of full duty free-quota free access under the interim EPA in place of the former ACP Banana Protocol. This is seen as a major success story. However 2018 could prove to be the high point of Ivorian banana exports. Ecuador’s accession to the EU-Andean Pact FTA from 1st January 2017 has seen a 14.4% expansion of Ecuadorian banana exports to the EU in 2017 (+186,613 tonnes) and a 20% growth in the first 6 months of 2018. This has seen the first decline in Cote d’Ivoire’s share of the EU banana market in a decade. If a ‘no-deal’ Brexit occurs and EU bilaterally negotiated $ banana TRQs are not apportioned between the EU27 and UK markets, this will result in a significant increase in competition for Ivorian banana exports to EU27 markets, given the UK has accounted in recent years for 20% of EU banana imports. This down turn in the fortunes of Ivorian banana exporters will coincide with the start of the phased elimination of import duties on EU products, which is scheduled to start from 1st January 2019 and take place over a 14 year period. Read more “Cote d’Ivoire: EPA Implementation in the Context of EU’s West Africa EPA Strategy”
CARIFORUM EU EPA: Slow Pace of Implementation and Marginal Benefits
Summary
The EC’s analysis of the CARIFORUM-EU EPA while factually accurate is misleading. While the EU’s growing trade surplus with CARIFORUM is acknowledged the importance of the principal change brought about by the EPA – improved market access for EU exporters is glossed over. EU agro-food exports have shown particular strong growth with dairy products, meat and meat preparations, beverages and fresh vegetables leading the way. In contrasts the value of CARIFORUM agro-food exports has stagnated, although the masks a rise in agro-food exports to the EU from the Dominican republic and a decline in the value of CARICOM exports. The decline in CARICOM exports however mask a rise in non-traditional exports and a dramatic fall in the value of banana and sugar exports to the EU. Despite the institutional structures in place the single most important issue facing CARIFORUM exporters to the EU, Brexit, has not been addressed within EPA consultative structures. The impact of Brexit on the value of preferential exports under the EU EPA will be so profound as to require an immediate policy response from the EU to areas of CARIFORUM concern in regard to improving EPA implementation (e.g. removing all obstacles to full DFQF exports to the DOMs and OCTs, intensifying and acting on SPS dialogues, eliminating UTPs along CARIFORUM-EU supply chains, introducing flexibility in EPA implementation). The EU also needs to recognise and address the effects of its wider policy changes on the value of preferential access granted CARIFORUM countries under the EPA. Failure to do so will amount to a continued failure to deliver on the expectations raised by the EPA agreement in the Caribbean region. Read more “CARIFORUM EU EPA: Slow Pace of Implementation and Marginal Benefits”
Impact of EU FTAs in the Agri-Food Sector
Summary
EU FTAs are of growing importance to the growth of EU agri-food sector exports, with the EU using a variety of policy tools to increasingly open up overseas markets to EU exports. However the EU’s use of trade policy tools to protect EU producers is in distinct contrast to the policy prescriptions the EU seeks to enshrine in its trade agreements with ACP countries when it comes to the use of traditional agri-food sector trade policy tools aimed at managing trade liberalisation processes in sensitive sectors. The structure of EU EPAs does little to address the fundamental structural imbalance in EU-ACP agri-food sector relations. Fundamental policy coherence issues need to be addressed across the broad ambit of EU-ACP agri-food sector relations if the structural imbalance is to be addressed. The challenges faced in this regard are only likely to be exacerbated by recent EU agricultural policy changes and the Brexit process. Read more “Impact of EU FTAs in the Agri-Food Sector”
The June 2018 CAP Reform: Part 4 CAP and Policy Coherence for Development
Summary
As part of the proposals for the revision of the EU’s common agricultural policy, the EC has released a substantive staff working paper which seeks to assess the impact of the European Commission proposals. Annex 5 of the EC Staff Working Paper which reviews the ‘Results of Quantitative and Multi-Criteria Analysis’ includes a section on ‘policy coherence’. This provides insights into the EC’s approach to addressing policy coherence for developments issues. It is noteworthy that policy coherence for development is only one dimension of the EU’s policy coherence agenda which need to be taken on board in the design and implementation of the CAP, and as such may not be accorded a high priority. While asserting the consistency of the CAP with EU development policy objectives the EU implicitly acknowledged the trade distorting nature of ‘coupled’ direct aid payments. This suggests a need for specific measures to avoid any adverse effects on developing countries in sector where sugar and dairy sectors are important or sector development programmes are under implementation. This is likely to require a flexible and responsible interpretation and enforcement of EPA commitments on the use of non-tariff trade measures by ACP governments. A commitment in this regard should be enshrined in ‘Right to Development’ provisions under future EU partnership agreements with African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. Read more “The June 2018 CAP Reform: Part 4 CAP and Policy Coherence for Development”
The June 2018 CAP Reforms: Part 3 the Trade Dimensions of the CAP and the ACP
Summary
In the background documentation to its CAP reform proposals the EC highlights the growing international focus of the EU agro-food sector and hence the importance of securing preferential trade access for EU agro-food exports to 3rd country markets where food demand is growing rapidly. This includes securing the preferential removal of not only tariffs on EU exports but also the removal of non-tariff barriers to EU agro-food exports. The EC analysis highlights just how central EU trade policy is to the implementation of the CAP and the achievement of overall EU policy objectives for the agricultural sector. In an ACP-EU context this suggests the issue of the interpretation and implementation of EPA commitments is likely to take on growing importance in the coming years. This needs to be seen in a context where EU policy prescriptions for ACP governments in sensitive agro-food sectors diverge markedly from EU policy practices in sensitive agro-food sectors. Read more “The June 2018 CAP Reforms: Part 3 the Trade Dimensions of the CAP and the ACP”